Issues began to arise a week before deadline that my images arent right for a 'fashion photography' degree submission.
(they new my images were going to include illustration weeks and weeks before) Apparently my images are fashion illustration not fashion photography and to guarantee a pass i have to make the illustrations more transparent...
ermm? ok.
i kinda feel like there just not open for change or diversity. here??
I dont know what to do.
Should i summit something im not proud of?
Should i summit something that is good for them but not for me?
and whats the point in using illustration but it looking bad?
any suggestions. ?
or any questions?
1. is what i want to submit ( although the contrast was much higher before)
2. is what they think i should submit.
just to add
- Ive submitted illustration & photography before and i got praise not drama.
- its for a fashion context so why isnt it a fashion image?
- is it not contemporary fashion photography?
- is it not the same as overly photoshopping stuff? editing random stuff in?
- Ive used my photography & art directional skills gained from the course?
- what boxes havent i ticking?
- what difference does it make if they are transparent or not?
Darling.
ReplyDeleteI think by making it more transparent they ment thet the attention of the viewer focuses on the model first.
check your email lov:
On the copy i put the contrast a bit up so the whole picture looks more sureal a bit and the ilustration blends in more.
On the copy1 I have croped the picture a bit so the illustration isint in the center and added a flare by the model to draw attention to him/.
maybe that helps??
Hmm, my opinion is that they didn't mean transparent as a...see through..But that the fashion photograph should be easy to perceive or detect... (English dictionary... ;) )...
ReplyDeleteI am sure that is not only the transparency of the graphic that seemed problematic for them...?!